HLL 0.1-TX
Grades, item by item
Every graded answer, every axis, every judge note, every citation check. Public-split items show the blinded facts and the model's full answer; private-split items show scores and notes only. Weights: Issue 1, Standard 2, Authority 2, Application 2, Outcome 2, Procedure 1. A fabricated citation caps the item at 25%.
35%hll-240052-1otherdifficulty 5private splitgoogle/gemini-2.5-flash · raw
Axes
Issue50%×1
Standard50%×2
Authority0%×2
Application50%×2
Outcome0%×2
Procedure100%×1
Citation checks
unverified282 S.W.3d 433
unverified381 S.W.3d 430
unverified356 S.W.3d 407
unverified438 S.W.3d 556
found401 S.W.3d 623
Judges (1 of 3 parsed, median wins)
#1: no parseable verdict
#2: no parseable verdict
#3: issue 1 · standard 1 · application 1 · procedure 2
The issue is partially correct but does not frame it specifically as whether the pouches are 'made of a tobacco substitute' under § 155.001(15)(E). The standard discusses statutory interpretation but lacks the specific elements of de novo review, ejusdem generis, and the definitions of 'made of' and 'substitute.' The application partially addresses the rejection of both sides' arguments but does not clearly articulate the court's reasoning or the final conclusion regarding taxability. The procedure is accurately described, noting the petition for review and the context of the court's judgment.
Private-split item: facts, gold and answer withheld so the leaderboard stays uncontaminated. Scores and judge notes above are complete.
17688ms · graded 2026-08-25 16:49